


The latest introduction to 'Multimodal LLM'! Data and proceedings are packaged and taken away directly
Progress tracking link (Awesome-MLLM, real-time updates): https://github.com/BradyFU/Awesome-Multimodal-Large-Language-Models
In recent years, research on Large Language Models (LLM) has made significant progress (such as GPT- 3, LLaMa, ChatGPT, GPT-4), these models have demonstrated excellent performance on various natural language processing (NLP) tasks.
Through pre-training on massive data, LLM has gained rich knowledge and powerful reasoning capabilities. Just need to input some user instructions, and these models can parse the instructions, perform reasoning and give answers that meet the user's expectations.
#Some typical capabilities LLM has include:
- · Execute new tasks not seen during training;
- · Complete new tasks with a few examples;
- · Perform complex reasoning tasks through reasoning chains;
- · Coordinate various models and tools to complete complex tasks .
There are many key ideas and technologies behind these capabilities, including Instruction Tuning, In-Context Learning ) and Chain of Thought, etc.
Multimodal large-scale language model
Although large language models have made great progress in the field of NLP, there are fewer corresponding models and technologies in the multimodal field. Exploration, and traditional visual-language models still have limitations such as insufficient generalization and lack of reasoning capabilities.
To this end, many scholars have recently turned their attention to an emerging direction: Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLM).
The main idea is to use LLM as the "brain" to integrate, reason, analyze and make decisions on the input multi-modal information, thereby completing the tasks delivered by humans.
From the perspective of developing general artificial intelligence, compared with LLM, MLLM has taken another step forward and has the following advantages:
· More in line with human’s habit of understanding the world. Humans have multiple senses and receive information from multiple modalities, which are often complementary and synergistic. Therefore, the use of multimodal information generally enables better recognition and completion of complex tasks;
· More powerful and user-friendly (User-Friendly) interface. By supporting multi-modal input, users can convey information in a more flexible way;
· Wider task support. LLM can usually only complete NLP related tasks, while MLLM can complete more tasks by accessing multi-modality.
From a system design perspective, MLLM can be divided into two categories:
· LLM serves as a reasoner and supports multi-modality Cognitive reasoning system for input;
· LLM as a multi-tool collaboration system for planner/scheduler/decision maker.
The former generally converts multi-modal information into a form that LLM can directly receive and process through a trainable multi-modal conversion interface. , enabling LLM to perform cognition and reasoning based on these multi-modal information and user instructions.
The latter usually uses LLM as a planner/scheduler/decision maker [1] to decompose complex tasks delivered by users into simpler sub-tasks, dispatch them to appropriate models/tools, and finally integrate the results and output.
We adopted another perspective, focusing on the key technologies and implementation methods behind MLLM, conducted research and summary on related work, and divided MLLM into the following categories:
·Multimodal Instruction Tuning
·Multimodal Instruction Tuning Multimodal In-Context Learning
·Multimodal Chain-of-Thought
·LLM-Aided Visual Reasoning
Below we will give a brief introduction to these types of work.
Multimodal Instruction Tuning
The basic method of multimodal instruction fine-tuning is to use a unified template to unify all types of data and The form of instructions describes task requirements, forming multi-modal instruction data, and then uses this data to fine-tune MLLM.
Due to the consistency of the instruction form during training and testing, LLM can generalize to other tasks more flexibly and obtain powerful zero samples by virtue of its powerful semantic understanding and reasoning capabilities. learning ability.
The basic form of multimodal instruction data can be summarized as (instruction, multimodal input, answer) triplet.
An intuitive way to obtain this kind of data is to transform the benchmark data set. We take image description (Image Captioning) as an example, as shown in Figure 1 below:
Figure 1. Example of multi-modal command data
Original Caption data The sample includes a picture and a text description (Ground Truth). This data-GT paired data naturally constitutes the multi-modal input and answer parts of the instruction data.
The instruction part is the description of the corresponding task, which is generally written manually or generated by calling GPT.
When fine-tuning multi-modal instructions, MLLM converts multi-modal inputs and sends them to LLM. LLM predicts answers based on multi-modal information and instruction text.
Multimodal In-Context Learning
The core idea of multimodal context learning is to learn from analogies. For example, the forms we generally come into contact with when studying are as follows:
# By studying examples, when we encounter new problems, we can use them through categories Learn basic ideas and methods of proportion problems to solve new problems.
In addition, the example questions can also standardize our answer format, which is more conducive to getting correct answers that meet the expected requirements.
As shown in Figure 2 below, let the model predict the calculation result of 3x7 through an example.
Figure 2. Example of multi-modal context data, using the example to let the model predict the calculation results of 3x7
Multimodal Chain-of-Thought
The thinking chain is a series of intermediate reasoning steps [2]. The basic idea of the multi-modal thinking chain is to make the model learn to output intermediate steps step by step, and finally deduce the final answer, as shown in Figure 3 below:
##Figure 3. Example of multi-modal thinking chain data
Compared to directly outputting answers, thinking chain:
· More in line with human reasoning habits: based on previous reasoning steps and results, it gradually leads to the final answer;
· Suitable for complex reasoning tasks, solving complex problems step by step, improving Accuracy of answers.
LLM-Aided Visual ReasoningUse LLM as a decision-making and reasoning mechanism, call various multi-modal models and tools and integrate the output , get the final answer. According to the way to complete the task, it can generally be divided into single-wheel model and multi-wheel model.
The basic idea of the single-round model is that LLM acts as a planner, scheduler and decision maker to coordinate various models/tools to complete tasks. It generally needs to complete the following functions[1]:
·Planner: Decompose complex tasks into solvable subtasks;
# #· Scheduler: Dispatches subtasks to appropriate models/tools;
· Decision maker: Manage the order of execution of subtasks and integrate the results of subtasks to get the final answer.
The multi-round model is based on the idea of iteration and continuously accumulates visual cognition until it is confident enough to obtain the final answer. In this process, LLM needs to integrate the previous steps (the questions raised and the visual cognitive information obtained) to determine whether the final answer can be output [3].For related papers, please see: https://github.com/BradyFU/Awesome-Multimodal-Large-Language-Models
The above is the detailed content of The latest introduction to 'Multimodal LLM'! Data and proceedings are packaged and taken away directly. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Imagine an artificial intelligence model that not only has the ability to surpass traditional computing, but also achieves more efficient performance at a lower cost. This is not science fiction, DeepSeek-V2[1], the world’s most powerful open source MoE model is here. DeepSeek-V2 is a powerful mixture of experts (MoE) language model with the characteristics of economical training and efficient inference. It consists of 236B parameters, 21B of which are used to activate each marker. Compared with DeepSeek67B, DeepSeek-V2 has stronger performance, while saving 42.5% of training costs, reducing KV cache by 93.3%, and increasing the maximum generation throughput to 5.76 times. DeepSeek is a company exploring general artificial intelligence

Earlier this month, researchers from MIT and other institutions proposed a very promising alternative to MLP - KAN. KAN outperforms MLP in terms of accuracy and interpretability. And it can outperform MLP running with a larger number of parameters with a very small number of parameters. For example, the authors stated that they used KAN to reproduce DeepMind's results with a smaller network and a higher degree of automation. Specifically, DeepMind's MLP has about 300,000 parameters, while KAN only has about 200 parameters. KAN has a strong mathematical foundation like MLP. MLP is based on the universal approximation theorem, while KAN is based on the Kolmogorov-Arnold representation theorem. As shown in the figure below, KAN has

Boston Dynamics Atlas officially enters the era of electric robots! Yesterday, the hydraulic Atlas just "tearfully" withdrew from the stage of history. Today, Boston Dynamics announced that the electric Atlas is on the job. It seems that in the field of commercial humanoid robots, Boston Dynamics is determined to compete with Tesla. After the new video was released, it had already been viewed by more than one million people in just ten hours. The old people leave and new roles appear. This is a historical necessity. There is no doubt that this year is the explosive year of humanoid robots. Netizens commented: The advancement of robots has made this year's opening ceremony look like a human, and the degree of freedom is far greater than that of humans. But is this really not a horror movie? At the beginning of the video, Atlas is lying calmly on the ground, seemingly on his back. What follows is jaw-dropping

The performance of JAX, promoted by Google, has surpassed that of Pytorch and TensorFlow in recent benchmark tests, ranking first in 7 indicators. And the test was not done on the TPU with the best JAX performance. Although among developers, Pytorch is still more popular than Tensorflow. But in the future, perhaps more large models will be trained and run based on the JAX platform. Models Recently, the Keras team benchmarked three backends (TensorFlow, JAX, PyTorch) with the native PyTorch implementation and Keras2 with TensorFlow. First, they select a set of mainstream

AI is indeed changing mathematics. Recently, Tao Zhexuan, who has been paying close attention to this issue, forwarded the latest issue of "Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society" (Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society). Focusing on the topic "Will machines change mathematics?", many mathematicians expressed their opinions. The whole process was full of sparks, hardcore and exciting. The author has a strong lineup, including Fields Medal winner Akshay Venkatesh, Chinese mathematician Zheng Lejun, NYU computer scientist Ernest Davis and many other well-known scholars in the industry. The world of AI has changed dramatically. You know, many of these articles were submitted a year ago.

The latest video of Tesla's robot Optimus is released, and it can already work in the factory. At normal speed, it sorts batteries (Tesla's 4680 batteries) like this: The official also released what it looks like at 20x speed - on a small "workstation", picking and picking and picking: This time it is released One of the highlights of the video is that Optimus completes this work in the factory, completely autonomously, without human intervention throughout the process. And from the perspective of Optimus, it can also pick up and place the crooked battery, focusing on automatic error correction: Regarding Optimus's hand, NVIDIA scientist Jim Fan gave a high evaluation: Optimus's hand is the world's five-fingered robot. One of the most dexterous. Its hands are not only tactile

Target detection is a relatively mature problem in autonomous driving systems, among which pedestrian detection is one of the earliest algorithms to be deployed. Very comprehensive research has been carried out in most papers. However, distance perception using fisheye cameras for surround view is relatively less studied. Due to large radial distortion, standard bounding box representation is difficult to implement in fisheye cameras. To alleviate the above description, we explore extended bounding box, ellipse, and general polygon designs into polar/angular representations and define an instance segmentation mIOU metric to analyze these representations. The proposed model fisheyeDetNet with polygonal shape outperforms other models and simultaneously achieves 49.5% mAP on the Valeo fisheye camera dataset for autonomous driving

This paper explores the problem of accurately detecting objects from different viewing angles (such as perspective and bird's-eye view) in autonomous driving, especially how to effectively transform features from perspective (PV) to bird's-eye view (BEV) space. Transformation is implemented via the Visual Transformation (VT) module. Existing methods are broadly divided into two strategies: 2D to 3D and 3D to 2D conversion. 2D-to-3D methods improve dense 2D features by predicting depth probabilities, but the inherent uncertainty of depth predictions, especially in distant regions, may introduce inaccuracies. While 3D to 2D methods usually use 3D queries to sample 2D features and learn the attention weights of the correspondence between 3D and 2D features through a Transformer, which increases the computational and deployment time.
