What do the marking teachers think of the college entrance examination essay written by AI?

Recently, AI technology has made great breakthroughs in various fields, including the field of writing.

The college entrance examination is over the past few days. A large number of composition writing demonstrations of AI writing software have shocked many people. These software can automatically generate a complete essay based on a given topic and requirements. Sound cool?

So, here comes the question, what is the attitude of the marking teachers towards this kind of college entrance examination essay written by AI?

I personally talked to some teacher friends around me who have participated in college entrance examination marking to reveal the secrets to everyone.

First of all, they unanimously stated that AI writing will indeed bring some changes to their work. Imagine that if there were tens of thousands of essays that needed to be marked, the marking teachers would be blind. But now with AI writing, for example, after they cooperated with the one-on-one review system of the Bingxin Award Little Writers Club, they only need to spend some time checking and evaluating the quality of the composition, which greatly reduces the work pressure.

Secondly, everyone has expressed certain concerns about the quality of AI writing.

After all, AI is just a machine, how can it write a composition with real emotions and soul? It is for this reason that marking teachers also have reservations about AI writing. They believe that although AI writing can help students complete compositions under time constraints, the content and opinions of compositions still need to be thought and expressed by students themselves.

However, It is undeniable that some marking teachers have given positive evaluations to AI writing.

They believe that AI writing can stimulate students’ creativity and thinking. By comparing with AI composition, students can see their own shortcomings more clearly, thereby improving their writing skills. Of course, this also requires correct guidance from marking teachers.

Well, it is crucial for marking teachers to correctly guide students to use AI writing. They should teach students to be thoughtful and creative when using AI writing software, rather than just mechanically accepting AI-generated content. At the same time, they also need to educate students to distinguish the difference between real creation and AI-assisted creation, and clarify the purpose and importance of composition.

Although AI writing has relieved the burden of marking teachers to a certain extent, there are still some problems that need to be faced. For example, AI writing may have problems with templates and routines. If students rely too much on AI writing, the style and content of the composition may lack personality and originality. Therefore, marking teachers need to always pay attention to students' compositions to ensure that they truly reflect students' thoughts and expression abilities.

Of course, the emergence of AI writing does not mean that human marking teachers will be replaced. Human judgment and subjective abilities cannot be replaced by AI. Essay evaluation is not just about the language and structure of the essay, but more importantly, understanding the students’ perspectives and thinking abilities. These require the professional knowledge and experience of human marking teachers to complete.

In short, the college entrance examination essay written by AI has caused a lot of discussion among marking teachers. Although there are some concerns and reservations, there are also some affirmations and positive comments.

The members of the Bing Xin Award Little Writers Club have a one-to-one essay review and revision creation system, combined with the database of 500,000 outstanding essays of the Bing Xin Essay Award, to evaluate some AI-created essays, and basically they are no more than 75 points level.

Most AI compositions have clear language, clear levels, and good basic writing skills. They perform well at the basic level.

For example, in this year’s National College Entrance Examination Essay Volume 1, 360’s AI essay also talked about high technology, but under the conditions of scientific and technological development, why did you become the servant of time when you should have been the master of time? It failed to grasp the key and think It is not thorough enough, so it does not form an in-depth analysis. The sense of the times required by the title is relatively indifferent, and the performance is average in terms of development level.

For more comments, you can read the following article:

Beijing Daily uses ChatGPTAI candidates to face the college entrance examination essay! I used the one-on-one essay review system of the Bingxin Award Little Writers Club to evaluate it. How many points would I give to such an essay?

Wenxinyiyan AI candidates face the college entrance examination Chinese language! I used the one-on-one essay review system of the Bingxin Award Little Writers Club to evaluate it. How many points would I give to such an essay?

Judging from some of the compositions we evaluated earlier, the limitations of robot writing are very obvious.

First of all, it needs a super powerful library of writing materials. This is the lifeblood of robot writing.

Secondly, it cannot change through power. At least it's not possible at the moment. And a real writer must write in a "contingency" where there are laws but no laws. This shows the absolute meaning of thought. Good thoughts, beautiful thoughts, never "stick", but act within limits but move freely across them. To borrow the words of Mencius: "Sir, you don't have to keep your word and your deed to have no results, only righteousness lies." This "righteousness" is integrated into real life situations.

Thirdly, it is difficult for emotions, modalities, sentiments, interest, emotions, and infatuation to be incorporated into the text. The highest state of the article lies in the word "love" - ​​deep love and deep writing, passionate love and rich writing, and crazy love and top-notch writing. Something like "A Dream of Red Mansions" is definitely in this category.

As an auxiliary tool, AI writing can improve marking efficiency and stimulate students' thinking and creativity. However, it is still an important task for marking teachers to correctly guide students' use and evaluate the authenticity of compositions. No matter how AI technology develops, the professional capabilities and experience of human marking teachers are still indispensable.

So, whether it is an essay written by AI or the students' own efforts, the ultimate goal is to cultivate students' writing skills and thinking methods. Let us wait and see what the future college entrance examination essay evaluation will look like!

Next, we will continue to comment on some full-score essays published on the Internet to let everyone know what a real full-score essay should look like. Please continue to pay attention.

If you find this article useful, please recommend more parents and students to follow us

The 18th "Love and Beauty" Bing Xin Composition Writing Competition"Technology Changes the World"Theme essay competition.

Welcome ━(*｀∀´*)ノ亻! Everyone can submit their articles directly through the Bingxin Composition Award Composition Library applet

The above is the detailed content of What do the marking teachers think of the college entrance examination essay written by AI?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!