After interviewing some operations and maintenance, I found 3 common points

Recently, due to some reasons, I needed to recruit an operation and maintenance personnel, so I screened a lot of resumes and interviewed a lot of people. I found that everyone had the same problems.

Mainly manifested in the following aspects:

1. The focus of the resume is not clear
2. Know a lot, but not perfect
3. Personal planning is not clear

Let me talk about my views from these three aspects.

The focus of the resume is not clear

The resume is very important, the resume is very important, the resume is very important.

Resume is a stepping stone for a person. Whether you can get an interview opportunity depends on whether your resume meets the needs.

I have never met you, and I know very little about you. How can I understand you? Just your resume.

However, I don’t know if it’s a common problem in IT or unique to operations and maintenance. I found that most people’s resumes are just like a list of empty seats, such as

• Responsible for the maintenance of certain virtualization, such as ESXI, PVE, etc.
• Responsible for the maintenance of certain middleware, such as Redis, MySQL, etc.
• Responsible for certain automation, such as Ansible, Jenkins, etc.

I don’t know what will happen in your mind when you see such a resume.

As far as I am concerned, I don’t know what the applicant did and what he gained.

These are familiar technologies, but I cannot effectively connect them based on the candidate's perspective.

As an applicant, you should first tell the interviewer directly what I know, that is, what my strengths are. This can be an outline (preferably suitable for the company you are applying for) Requirements), for example:

• #Have 5 years of experience in virtualization maintenance, completed the virtualization of 500 applications on 10 platforms in 3 companies, and led the development of a certain virtualization platform Design and implementation, etc.
• Have 4 years of open source experience, participated in the open source of a certain system, what are you mainly responsible for, how is the current stage of the product, etc.
• Have 2 years of management experience, how many people have you managed, what is the growth of the team during the management period, such as receiving a certain award from the company, etc.

is usually listed on the homepage of the resume Showing your strengths will not only attract the interviewer's attention, but also make the interviewer have a better impression of you.

Then write down the work experience of each company. Don’t remember the assembly line at this stage. Write down specifically what you did, what you brought to the team, and what you brought to the company. , that is, the real value output, such as:

• For example, be responsible for the architecture selection and design of a certain platform, what specific technologies are used, what platforms are built, and what How much profit is coming.
• For example, you are responsible for the management of a certain team, how many people you manage, how much team value you create, and your role in the enterprise.

There is a goal, a process, and a gain.

Not only can you see your professional abilities, but it can also well reflect your ability to do things logically.

In addition, select a few projects that are challenging and have obvious benefits and describe them in detail, so that the interviewer can have an in-depth understanding of your details.

I summarize this as follows (based on the resume of a big boss friend):

Work your way up from bottom to top to get yourself an interview opportunity.

I know a lot, but I am not good at it

I don’t know if everyone has the same feeling. I feel that I know a lot of things, but during the interview At the time, I couldn't fully explain it.

As the interviewer continues to ask questions, he will also continue to doubt himself. Is this a technology I’ve been exposed to? Are you sure this is the technique I used before?

As I continue to participate in interviews, I feel this very strongly.

Only focus on the breadth of knowledge, not the depth of knowledge.

This will give people the illusion: I know everything, and I will definitely get a higher offer and a better platform in my next job.

However, during the actual interview, when the interviewer continues to ask questions about your skills, you will be hesitant, confused, and nervous.

This will not only affect your overall interview thinking, but also affect the interviewer's evaluation of you.

What should we do?

In large companies, the role of operation and maintenance is generally very detailed, such as DBAs focusing on databases, network engineers focusing on networks, YAML engineers focusing on K8s, etc. In this kind of detailed In a company with clearly defined fields, the professional route is relatively obvious and it is easy to find the right direction.

In many small and medium-sized enterprises, the operation and maintenance team is usually small, or even only one person, so this person needs to have a variety of skills. These companies mainly focus on business. The use of a certain technology does not require in-depth and sophisticated understanding, just mastering and being able to use it. So what should we do, because this may prevent operation and maintenance personnel from understanding or in-depth research on a certain technology

My understanding is to deal with the best based on the situation of oneself and the industry:

• Review your own technology stack and learn the best 1-2 technologies
• Combined with your own development plan, you will need Learn to understand the technologies used
• According to the current status of the industry, learn the hottest technologies at home

I feel like I have said it A bunch of nonsense....

Not clear personal planning

The second point...

Some of the people interviewed recently are people who have worked for more than 10 years.

The interviewer actually has certain expectations for these people. After all, after more than 10 years of experience in this industry, they will definitely have their own understanding and unique abilities.

However, after the interview, I found that there are very few people with clear plans and unique abilities, and most of them are just working passively.

Passive work will cause a terrible problem, which is the decline in independent thinking ability.

When a person does not often deliberately train his ability to think independently, this part of the brain will gradually become marginalized, leaving you always in the stage of "taking one ha, jumping one ha" , Not only is it not conducive to personal improvement, it is also conducive to career development.

In the final analysis, I just don’t know what I want.

When a person knows what he wants, he will find ways to move forward in this direction. The clearer your goal, the clearer the plan.

However, most people find their way through a long process of exploration. But what's the problem with this? Just find the direction.

Finally

The above are all personal opinions. If you have any adverse reactions, please like and follow.

As far as I am concerned, I am also a part of the above 3 points.

Some students may say: Then why are you talking nonsense here?

This is what makes me different from others. I like to summarize and try to make changes based on these summaries. Maybe the results will be unsatisfactory, but I enjoy the process.

At the same time, I also hope that people who have the same situation or feelings as me can get some inspiration from it, such as optimizing and optimizing their resumes so that they can get more interview opportunities. For example, study some specific technologies carefully and let yourself beat the interviewer in this aspect.

No matter which one it is, you must keep yourself growing upward.

The times will eliminate some people, not including you.

The above is the detailed content of After interviewing some operations and maintenance, I found 3 common points. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!