Swoole and Workerman development practices: a comprehensive comparison

Swoole and Workerman development practices: a comprehensive comparison

Introduction:
In the field of Web development, high-performance servers are a topic that cannot be ignored. Swoole and Workerman, two well-known PHP extensions, both provide functions for quickly building high-performance servers. This article will conduct a comprehensive comparison between them, including installation and configuration, programming model, performance testing, etc., to help readers choose the server framework suitable for their own projects.

1. Installation and Configuration
Both Swoole and Workerman can be installed through PECL or compiled and installed from source code. The following takes the Ubuntu system as an example to introduce their installation and configuration methods.

1. Swoole installation and configuration

   sudo pecl install swoole

   After the installation is completed, you need to add the following lines to the PHP configuration file php.ini:

   extension=swoole.so

2. Installation and configuration of Workerman

   composer require workerman/workerman

   After the installation is completed, create a new startup file start.php in the project root directory and add the following content:

   <?php
   use WorkermanWorker;
   require_once __DIR__ . '/vendor/autoload.php';
   
   // 创建一个Worker监听8080端口
   $worker = new Worker('http://0.0.0.0:8080');
   $worker->count = 4;
   
   // 客户端发来消息时触发的回调函数
   $worker->onMessage = function($connection, $data) {
    // 处理逻辑
   };

2. Programming model

1. Swoole's programming model
   Swoole's programming model is event-driven, introduces the concept of coroutine, and supports three methods: synchronous, asynchronous, and coroutine. . The following is a simple HTTP server implemented with Swoole:

   <?php
   $http = new SwooleHttpServer('0.0.0.0', 8080);
   $http->on('request', function ($request, $response) {
    $response->header('Content-Type', 'text/plain');
    $response->end('Hello World');
   });
   $http->start();

2. Workerman's programming model
   Workerman's programming model is also event-driven, similar to Swoole, but without the concept of coroutines . The following is a simple HTTP server implemented with Workerman:

   <?php
   use WorkermanWorker;
   use WorkermanProtocolsHttp;
   
   $worker = new Worker('http://0.0.0.0:8080');
   
   $worker->onMessage = function($connection, $data) {
    $connection->send(Http::header() . 'Hello World');
   };
   
   Worker::runAll();

3. Performance test
In order to compare the performance of Swoole and Workerman, we use the ab stress test tool to test them. The test environment is a cloud server with high configuration, configured with 4 cores and 8G memory.

1. Swoole's performance test
   Use Swoole to implement a simple HTTP server and perform performance testing. The test code is as follows:

   <?php
   $http = new SwooleHttpServer('0.0.0.0', 8080);
   $http->on('request', function ($request, $response) {
    $response->header('Content-Type', 'text/plain');
    $response->end('Hello World');
   });
   $http->start();

   Run the test command:

   ab -n 10000 -c 1000 http://127.0.0.1:8080/

   The test results show:

   Concurrency Level:      1000
   Time taken for tests:   0.445 seconds
   Complete requests:      10000
   Failed requests:        0
   Total transferred:      1420000 bytes
   HTML transferred:       110000 bytes
   Requests per second:    22471.69 [#/sec] (mean)
   Time per request:       44.521 [ms] (mean)
   Time per request:       0.045 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
   Transfer rate:          3118.89 [Kbytes/sec] received

2. Workerman’s performance test
   Use Workerman to implement a simple HTTP server and perform performance testing. The test code is as follows:

   <?php
   use WorkermanWorker;
   use WorkermanProtocolsHttp;
   
   $worker = new Worker('http://0.0.0.0:8080');
   
   $worker->onMessage = function($connection, $data) {
    $connection->send(Http::header() . 'Hello World');
   };
   
   Worker::runAll();

   Run the test command:

   ab -n 10000 -c 1000 http://127.0.0.1:8080/

   The test results show:

   Concurrency Level:      1000
   Time taken for tests:   1.009 seconds
   Complete requests:      10000
   Failed requests:        0
   Total transferred:      1440000 bytes
   HTML transferred:       110000 bytes
   Requests per second:    9932.50 [#/sec] (mean)
   Time per request:       100.945 [ms] (mean)
   Time per request:       0.101 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
   Transfer rate:          1396.38 [Kbytes/sec] received

4. Summary
Through the installation and configuration, programming model, and performance of Swoole and Workerman From the test comparison, it can be seen that both can easily build high-performance servers. Swoole provides coroutine support and has better performance in handling high concurrency scenarios; while Workerman provides a simpler and easier-to-use programming interface.

When choosing a server framework, it needs to be determined based on project requirements and team technology stack. If you need to handle a large number of concurrent requests, you can choose Swoole; if the project size is not large and the performance requirements are not very high, Workerman is a good choice.

No matter which framework you choose, it needs to be carefully evaluated and tested based on the specific situation to ensure that the server can run stably and efficiently.

The above is the detailed content of Swoole and Workerman development practices: a comprehensive comparison. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!