Hello everyone, my name is Luga. Today we continue to explore a technology-related topic in the artificial intelligence ecosystem - the observability of LLM (Large Language Model). This article will continue to analyze the observability of LLM in depth to help everyone understand its importance and core ecosystem knowledge.
In today’s digitally connected world, large language models (LLM) are like a super Magicians with powerful abilities can quickly generate text, translate languages, create music, write poetry, program, etc., which brings great convenience to people's lives. However, due to the complexity of LLM, its management and use also face some challenges.
LLM usually contains hundreds of millions or even billions of parameters, and the interactions between these parameters are very complex. Therefore, it is not easy to accurately predict the output of LLM. In addition, the training data used by LLM usually comes from the real world, which may contain bias or erroneous information. These biases and errors can cause LLM to generate text with errors or biases.
Therefore, LLM Observability (Large Language Model Observability) is the key to solving the above challenges. It can help users understand the running status, performance and security of LLM. Specifically, observability provides the following information: LLM's real-time operating data, resource utilization, request response time, error rate, logging, etc. This information can help users discover and solve problems in a timely manner, optimize the performance of LLM, and ensure its safe operation. By providing comprehensive observability, LLM Observability enables users to better understand and manage LLM operations.
Based on the above related information, users can effectively manage and use LLM to ensure that LLM can operate safely, stably and efficiently.
Figure: The five pillars of LLM observability
Generally speaking, LLM (Large model) The five pillars of observability mainly include the following:
"Evaluation" is an important pillar of LLM observability, used to understand and verify LLM model performance and capture potential hallucinations or issues such as question-answering questions. Evaluating the performance of LLMs is critical to ensuring the quality and reliability of the model. We can conduct plausibility assessment through common evaluation methods and techniques such as test data sets, A/B testing, metrics and evaluation criteria, user feedback and subjective evaluation, and model interpretive evaluation. These evaluation methods can help us understand the accuracy, robustness, generalization ability and interpretability of the model, as well as the model's performance in different tasks and scenarios. Through continuous evaluation and improvement, we can improve the performance and effectiveness of LLM models to better meet user needs.
By evaluating the performance of LLM, we can discover its potential problems and room for improvement. These evaluation results can guide subsequent optimization and improvement efforts to improve the quality and reliability of LLM.
In actual scenarios, it should be noted that LLM evaluation is a continuous iterative process. As the model is used and the environment changes, it may need to be evaluated and updated regularly. This ensures that LLM maintains high performance and accuracy under changing conditions.
The unique feature of LLM applications is their ability to capture spans and spans from common LLM application frameworks such as LangChain and LlamaIndex tracking information. These frameworks provide powerful tools and capabilities to help developers effectively monitor and document the span and execution paths of LLM applications.
By using these common LLM application frameworks, developers can take advantage of the span and trace capabilities they provide to gain insights into the behavior and performance of LLM applications. This helps monitor and optimize the operation of LLM applications and provides valuable insights that can be used to improve and enhance the performance and reliability of LLM.
In order to track LLM performance problems, we can use Evals or traditional indicators as indicators to measure performance. These metrics can help us evaluate critical aspects such as accuracy, response time, resource utilization, etc. of LLM. By monitoring these metrics, we can quickly identify potential performance issues and take appropriate steps to improve them.
In addition, in order to accurately reproduce the problem, I think we can use real-time production data. By using data from actual production environments, we can simulate LLM runs under real-world scenarios and perform specific operations repeatedly to accurately reproduce performance issues. Such reproductions can help us better understand the root cause of the problem and implement appropriate solutions to resolve it.
Normally, we can add our proprietary data to LLM by using RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation). RAG is a powerful model architecture that combines retrieval and generation capabilities to combine our proprietary data with LLM. This combination enables LLM to leverage our proprietary data for more accurate and targeted inference and generation.
However, in order to ensure that the performance of LLM is optimized to the greatest extent, it is crucial to troubleshoot and evaluate the RAG. Troubleshooting RAG allows us to identify and resolve issues that may cause LLM performance degradation or error generation. At the same time, evaluating RAG can help us understand its performance on specific tasks or data sets and thus select the most suitable configuration and parameter settings.
Therefore, troubleshooting and evaluating RAG are critical steps to ensure LLM performance is optimized. After all, it helps us ensure smooth integration of LLM with our proprietary data, thereby improving the quality and reliability of LLM.
The generalization ability of the model depends on the quality and quantity of the training data it receives. Therefore, large amounts of real or artificially generated data need to be collected and divided into data examples or problem clusters.
A data example can be a single data point or a combination of multiple data points. Issue clusters can be clusters based on specific issue types or domains. The format of the data points needs to be consistent with the requirements of the fine-tuning workflow.
Generally speaking, the core elements of LLM (large model) observability involve performance tracking, in-depth understanding, reliability guarantee, accuracy, etc. levels, specifically as follows:
Observability is the cornerstone of LLM (Large Model Language), and the most critical component is consistent "performance tracking" . This process involves collecting key metrics related to LLM capabilities, such as accuracy predictions, response times, error types and biases, etc. These metrics not only help us identify and resolve performance issues, but also provide insights into LLM operational status and potential issues.
In actual performance tracking scenarios, we can use a variety of techniques. Generally speaking, metrics such as accuracy, precision, and recall remain popular choices. Accuracy measures the proportion of correct predictions, precision measures the relevance of those predictions, and recall measures the number of relevant results captured by the model. Of course, in addition to the above, we can also use other metrics, such as latency, throughput, resource usage, and security.
In actual business scenarios, "logging" is another core method of performance tracking. It provides detailed logs about model behavior, including inputs, outputs, errors, and other anomalies. These details help diagnose LLM problems such as bias, discrimination, and other security issues.
In addition to the above-mentioned performance tracking, an in-depth understanding of LLM (Large Model Language) is also a key element of observability. This requires careful examination of the training data, articulation of the decision-making algorithm, identification of any limitations, and a solid understanding of the model's limitations.
(1)Training data
Understanding the distribution of training data is crucial because biases in the data may translate into biases in the model. For example, if the training dataset contains mostly male voices, the model may be more sensitive to male voices, resulting in a bias against female voices.
In addition to bias, noise and inconsistencies in training data may also affect model performance. Therefore, before using training data, we need to carefully check the quality and reliability of the data.
(2) Decision-making algorithm
Analysis of the decision-making mechanism can help identify possible biases or inaccuracies in the model. For example, if a model behaves abnormally when processing a specific type of input, this may indicate a flaw in the decision-making algorithm. Therefore, by understanding the decision-making mechanisms, we can more easily identify and correct potential problems with the model.
(3)Limitations
Recognizing the limitations of LLM is invaluable. Although these models are advanced, they are not perfect. They may exhibit biases, generate errors, and be susceptible to certain unusual inputs.
For example, LLMs may produce biased results because they are trained on datasets that contain biases. Additionally, LLMs can generate errors because they are based on probabilistic models and therefore have a certain degree of uncertainty. Finally, LLM may be affected by certain anomalous inputs, such as inputs containing errors or malicious content.
Ensuring the reliability of LLM is another core element of observability. A reliable LLM is able to operate stably under a variety of input scenarios without crashing or producing erroneous output even under harsh or abnormal conditions.
The most common strategy is stress testing, as a common method to verify the reliability of the LLM, by providing the LLM with various inputs, including inputs designed to challenge the model to push it to its limits. A reliable LLM will be able to handle these inputs without crashing or producing erroneous output.
Fault tolerance is another common strategy to ensure LLM reliability. The fault-tolerant design allows LLM to continue operating when certain components fail. For example, if a layer of the LLM fails, the fault-tolerant model should still be able to generate accurate predictions.
The last key goal of LLM observability is to improve the "accuracy" of the model, which requires identifying and mitigating biases and errors. Bias and errors are two key factors that affect model accuracy.
Deviation usually refers to the difference between the model prediction results and the real situation. Bias may come from factors such as data set, model design, or training process. Bias can cause a model to produce unfair or inaccurate results.
Error usually means that the model prediction results are inconsistent with the real situation. Errors can come from randomness in the model, noise, or other factors. Errors can cause models to produce inaccurate results.
Deviation detection and error detection are two common techniques for identifying and mitigating deviations and errors. Bias detection identifies systematic deviations in model predictions, while error detection identifies any inaccuracies in model output.
Once deviations and errors are identified, we can correct them through various measures. In actual business scenarios, corrective measures mainly include the following:
Commonly used error correction measures mainly involve the following levels:
Thus, through the above, LLM observability can help improve the reliability and observability of LLM only by carefully tracking performance design, enhancing understanding of LLM, optimizing accuracy, and ensuring reliability. reliability.
In summary, when using LLM, ensuring its observability is a key practice that helps ensure the reliability and trustworthiness of using LLM. By monitoring the performance metrics and behavior of LLMs, gaining insights into their inner workings, and ensuring the accuracy and reliability of LLMs, organizations can effectively reduce the risks associated with these powerful AI models.
Reference: [1] https://docs.arize.com/arize/what-is-llm-observability
The above is the detailed content of A brief analysis of LLM observability. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!
Application of artificial intelligence in life
What is the basic concept of artificial intelligence
What do computer software systems include?
okx exchange
How the tcp three-way handshake works
WAN access settings
AccessDenied error solution
What is the difference between Douyin and Douyin Express Edition?
![[Web front-end] Node.js quick start](https://img.php.cn/upload/course/000/000/067/662b5d34ba7c0227.png)
