Buterin emphasized the importance of public transparency and responsibility and responded to the FTX and OpenAI incidents

Recently, an article by a doctor from the West Coast of the United States caused widespread discussion in the community. The title of the article is "Against Learning From Dramatic Events," in which the author objects to people learning lessons or drawing conclusions from dramatic events. This suggests that the authors believe that lessons learned from extreme or unusual events may not be accurate or applicable in general situations. This perspective has led to thinking and discussion about the origin and reliability of lessons. The author puts forward the idea that we should pay more attention to normal, common situations rather than paying too much attention to those rare or dramatic events. This perspective reminds us to be careful about drawing conclusions from certain events and to reflect on the way we select and apply lessons. We should pay more attention to experience and data based on normalcy to better guide our decisions

Reflections on the FTX and OpenAI events

First of all, the author is the founder of the bankrupt cryptocurrency exchange FTX The SBF incident, as an example, emphasizes the importance of supervision and transparency. As a young CEO rising to prominence in the fintech sector, SBF's actions have sparked harsh criticism of deception. At that time, many people believed that deception should be quickly exposed even if there was no conclusive evidence. The incident highlights the importance of oversight and transparency in a company like FTX that doesn’t even have a board of directors.

However, the incident of the OpenAI board of directors expelling Sam Altman became another focus. This incident showed everyone a negative lesson. Accusing senior leaders without solid evidence can unfairly damage their reputations. Additionally, the incident highlights the potential dangers of powerful boards and the need to quickly express a position during major news events.

Ironically, one incident encourages people to react quickly and expose potential misconduct; on the other hand, they are reminded to proceed with caution and avoid unnecessary waves.

Attracting V God to respond: The public’s legitimacy should be respected

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik’s response to these two cases shows that he believes that the core of these issues lies in the legitimacy of the public.

First of all, regarding the situation of SBF, Buterin believes that his mistake lies not only in the fraudulent behavior, but also in the "awakening slogan" he used. In Buterin’s view, these actions show contempt for public trust and legitimacy. In this case, Buterin believes that it is not only important to expose his fraud, but also that SBF should respect and maintain public trust.

Secondly, when talking about the behavior of the OpenAI board of directors, Buterin put forward a similar point of view. In this case, the board suddenly made big decisions and seemed to think they didn't need to explain them to the public. In V God's view, this is also a disregard for public legitimacy. He believes that transparency and accountability to the public are extremely important, regardless of the content of the decision.

The above is the detailed content of Buterin emphasized the importance of public transparency and responsibility and responded to the FTX and OpenAI incidents. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!