Validate input fields using two possible names
php Xiaobian Strawberry introduces you a method to verify the input field: use two possible names for verification. Validation of input fields is a very important step when developing a website or application. By using two possible names, you can increase the security and accuracy of your input fields. This method validates by comparing the actual name of the input field with an alternate name. If both names match, the input field is considered valid. This verification method avoids problems caused by user input errors or malicious input and provides more reliable data protection.
Question content
I am migrating an API originally written in Python. The Python API allows you to send requests as camelCase or snake_case as follows:
This is allowed
<code>{ "someInput": "nice" } </code>
This is allowed
<code>{ "some_input": "nice" } </code>
This is done using a great Python library: Pydantic
<code>from pydantic import BaseModel def to_camel(string): words = string.split('_') return words[0] + ''.join(word.capitalize() for word in words[1:]) class InputModel(BaseModel): some_input: str class Config: alias_generator = to_camel allow_population_by_field_name = True </code>
This allows the creation of InputModels by alias (someInput) or field name (some_input). I want to do the same or equivalent thing in Go. I'm using gin:
<code>func Routes(router *gin.Engine) { v1 := router.Group("/v1") { v1.POST("/shipments", controllers.ShipmentCreator) } } func ShipmentCreator(ctx *gin.Context) { ResponseController := new(internal.OutputModel) var body domain.ShipmentsInputModel if err := ctx.BindJSON(&body); err != nil { fmt.Println(err) } validate := validator.New() err := validate.Struct(body) if err != nil { var validationErrors validator.ValidationErrors errors.As(err, &validationErrors) for _, validationError := range validationErrors { ResponseController.AddError(internal.ErrorsModel{ Parameter: validationError.Field(), Message: validationError.Error(), }) } ctx.JSON(http.StatusBadRequest, ResponseController) return } </code>
My input structure looks like this:
<code>type ShipmentsInputModel struct { LotId string `json:"lotId" tag:"lot_id" alias:"lot_id" validate:"required"` } </code>
This doesn't work when my input is:
<code>{ "lot_id": "someLotId" } </code>
It returns:
"message": "Key: 'ShipmentsInputModel.LotId' Error:Field validation for 'LotId' failed on the 'required' tag",
How can I accept both camelCase and snake_case?
Workaround
In Go, you cannot provide two JSON tags for a single struct field at the same time. JSON tags are specified using a single string that defines how a field should be marshaled (serialized to JSON) or unmarshaled (deserialized from JSON). You cannot directly specify multiple labels for a single field in a structure.
If you need to support CamelCase and SnakeCase in JSON output, you typically have to choose a consistent naming convention for the structure fields and then use the appropriate JSON markup for all fields.
There is a clever way to do this. I hope this helps.
package main import ( "encoding/json" "fmt" ) type ShipmentsInputModel struct { LotID } type LotID struct { LotId string `json:"lotId,omitempty"` Lot_ID string `json:"lot_id,omitempty"` } func (s *ShipmentsInputModel) setLodID(id string) { s.LotId = id s.Lot_ID = id } func main() { shipment := ShipmentsInputModel{} shipment.setLodID("someLotID") // Convert struct to JSON jsonData, err := json.Marshal(shipment) if err != nil { fmt.Println("Error:", err) return } // prints: {"lotId":"someLotID","lot_id":"someLotID"} fmt.Println(string(jsonData)) }
The above is the detailed content of Validate input fields using two possible names. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics



The article explains how to use the pprof tool for analyzing Go performance, including enabling profiling, collecting data, and identifying common bottlenecks like CPU and memory issues.Character count: 159

The article discusses writing unit tests in Go, covering best practices, mocking techniques, and tools for efficient test management.

This article demonstrates creating mocks and stubs in Go for unit testing. It emphasizes using interfaces, provides examples of mock implementations, and discusses best practices like keeping mocks focused and using assertion libraries. The articl

OpenSSL, as an open source library widely used in secure communications, provides encryption algorithms, keys and certificate management functions. However, there are some known security vulnerabilities in its historical version, some of which are extremely harmful. This article will focus on common vulnerabilities and response measures for OpenSSL in Debian systems. DebianOpenSSL known vulnerabilities: OpenSSL has experienced several serious vulnerabilities, such as: Heart Bleeding Vulnerability (CVE-2014-0160): This vulnerability affects OpenSSL 1.0.1 to 1.0.1f and 1.0.2 to 1.0.2 beta versions. An attacker can use this vulnerability to unauthorized read sensitive information on the server, including encryption keys, etc.

This article explores Go's custom type constraints for generics. It details how interfaces define minimum type requirements for generic functions, improving type safety and code reusability. The article also discusses limitations and best practices

The article discusses Go's reflect package, used for runtime manipulation of code, beneficial for serialization, generic programming, and more. It warns of performance costs like slower execution and higher memory use, advising judicious use and best

The article discusses using table-driven tests in Go, a method that uses a table of test cases to test functions with multiple inputs and outcomes. It highlights benefits like improved readability, reduced duplication, scalability, consistency, and a

This article explores using tracing tools to analyze Go application execution flow. It discusses manual and automatic instrumentation techniques, comparing tools like Jaeger, Zipkin, and OpenTelemetry, and highlighting effective data visualization
