Convert big.Int to int64 and vice versa as well as two's complement
php editor Youzi will introduce to you how to convert big.Int to int64 in PHP, and how to convert int64 to big.Int. In computer programming, big.Int and int64 are two different data types. big.Int is used to handle large integers, while int64 is a 64-bit signed integer type. When doing type conversion, we need to pay attention to the concept of two's complement, which is a way of representing signed integers in computers. Next, we will detail the conversion process between these two types.
Question content
I'm trying to convert a go big.int representing a 128-bit integer to [2]int64. The idea is to be able to match rust's i128::to_le_bytes(), which encodes 128-bit signed integers into little-endian byte order. This example matches rust's i128::to_le_bytes()
. Whenever I try to convert it back to big.int I don't get the same value. Are any bits lost when doing the initial right shift? Thanks.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 |
|
Solution
There are many problems here:
value
cannot be represented in terms of int64
, so the result of value.int64()
is undefined.
Your lower bits are not taking into account the signed result of int64
, so you may be adding negative numbers to the result. You need to use uint64
(or at least convert it before adding it to big.int
).
You are changing the value
within the rsh
method, so even if the value is recreated correctly, the final comparison will fail. If you want to compare, create a new big.int
to store the original value.
If you want the raw data representation of big.int
to be exactly 128 bits, you can use the fillbytes
method. We can take the big-endian data and construct 2 64-bit values like this:
1 2 3 4 5 6 |
|
Now that the byte order is fixed, add the sign bit to the result. However, in order to make it work like int128
we need to set the symbol
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 |
|
To create a new big.int
, reverse the entire process:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 |
|
Example of testing multiple key values: https://go.dev/play/ p/e1e-5cilflr
Since the output is written as an unsigned value, if you can start with a value > maxint128 you should also add a check to ensure that signed values are not overflowed. Storing them as [2]int64
would be more confusing because we need uint64 values for bitwise operations, and we need to make sure that the int64
values don't roll over by their own complement . In this case it would be easier to convert [2]int64
to and from [2]uint64
around a given function.
The above is the detailed content of Convert big.Int to int64 and vice versa as well as two's complement. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.
