Golang libvirt guest-agent is not available
php editor Youzi found that recently some users reported that they encountered unavailability problems when using libvirt guest-agent in Golang. libvirt guest-agent is part of the libvirt library and is used to communicate with the guest operating system in a virtual machine. However, some users have experienced connectivity issues or functionality glitches when trying to use it. This is a frustrating issue for developers who rely on libvirt guest-agent for virtual machine management and monitoring. Next, we'll explore possible causes and solutions to help resolve this issue.
Question content
I am trying to communicate with a guest agent on a qemu instance via the libvirt golang api. However, it always refuses my connection to
2022-12-02t00:10:43.799+0100 dpanic test/main.go:335 failed to connect to guest {"error": "virerror(code=86, domain=10, message='guest agent is not responding: qemu guest agent is not connected')"}
Even if the qemu instance is fully started and the guest agent is accessible via the command line
sudo virsh qemu-agent-command test-vm '{"execute":"guest-info"}'
Is this a bug in the implementation or do I have to register the proxy somewhere in the go code? I can't find a reference in the documentation.
<channel type='unix'> <source mode='bind' path='/var/lib/libvirt/qemu/channel/target/domain-6-test-vm/org.qemu.guest_agent.0'/> <target type='virtio' name='org.qemu.guest_agent.0' state='connected'/> <alias name='channel0'/> <address type='virtio-serial' controller='0' bus='0' port='1'/> </channel>
Thanks!
Solution
I don’t know what the final reason is. I have a loop and am accessing, or more specifically, trying to access a proxy. I changed it to use a timeout of 500ms but it didn't work.
type qemuStatusResponse struct { Return struct { Exitcode int `json:"exitcode,omitempty"` OutData string `json:"out-data,omitempty"` Exited bool `json:"exited,omitempty"` ErrData string `json:"err-data,omitempty"` } `json:"return,omitempty"` } func (l *LibvirtInstance) waitForCompletion(ctx context.Context, pid int, domain *libvirt.Domain) (response *qemuStatusResponse, err error) { response = &qemuStatusResponse{} ticker := time.NewTicker(500 * time.Millisecond) defer ticker.Stop() for { select { case <-ticker.C: result, err := domain.QemuAgentCommand( fmt.Sprintf(` { "execute": "guest-exec-status", "arguments": { "pid": %d } }`, pid), libvirt.DOMAIN_QEMU_AGENT_COMMAND_BLOCK, 0) if err != nil { return nil, err } if err := json.Unmarshal([]byte(result), response); err != nil { return nil, err } if response.Return.Exited { return response, nil } case <-ctx.Done(): return nil, ctx.Err() } } }
Additionally, I encountered some stability issues (i.e. when multiple concurrent requests were made to the connection, it would sometimes get corrupted). I found some articles online suggesting adding users to the kvm
group. This works for me.
The above is the detailed content of Golang libvirt guest-agent is not available. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

The main differences between Node.js and Tomcat are: Runtime: Node.js is based on JavaScript runtime, while Tomcat is a Java Servlet container. I/O model: Node.js uses an asynchronous non-blocking model, while Tomcat is synchronous blocking. Concurrency handling: Node.js handles concurrency through an event loop, while Tomcat uses a thread pool. Application scenarios: Node.js is suitable for real-time, data-intensive and high-concurrency applications, and Tomcat is suitable for traditional Java web applications.

Yes, Node.js is a backend development language. It is used for back-end development, including handling server-side business logic, managing database connections, and providing APIs.

Answer: Using NIO technology you can create a scalable API gateway in Java functions to handle a large number of concurrent requests. Steps: Create NIOChannel, register event handler, accept connection, register data, read and write handler, process request, send response

Redis is a non-relational database that stores data in key-value pairs. It has the characteristics of schema, key-value storage, high concurrency and persistence, and is suitable for scenarios such as caching, session management, queues and distributed locks.

Concurrency testing and debugging Concurrency testing and debugging in Java concurrent programming are crucial and the following techniques are available: Concurrency testing: Unit testing: Isolate and test a single concurrent task. Integration testing: testing the interaction between multiple concurrent tasks. Load testing: Evaluate an application's performance and scalability under heavy load. Concurrency Debugging: Breakpoints: Pause thread execution and inspect variables or execute code. Logging: Record thread events and status. Stack trace: Identify the source of the exception. Visualization tools: Monitor thread activity and resource usage.

Yes, Node.js can be used for front-end development, and key advantages include high performance, rich ecosystem, and cross-platform compatibility. Considerations to consider are learning curve, tool support, and small community size.

The performance differences between Redis and MySQL are obvious: 1. Reading performance: Redis memory storage has fast reading speed, while MySQL disk storage has reading limited by disk I/O. 2. Write performance: MySQL transaction model ensures data consistency, and write performance is usually better. Redis asynchronous writes can cause data loss. 3. Concurrency: Redis single-threaded architecture and event loop, high concurrency processing capabilities, MySQL multi-threaded architecture, concurrency is affected by the number of connections. 4. Data modeling: The Redis key-value data model is suitable for simple key/value pair storage, and MySQL has rich data modeling functions and supports relationships and constraints. 5. Scalability: Redis sharding and replication are easy to expand, MySQL cluster and

Golang is better than Java in terms of web performance for the following reasons: a compiled language, directly compiled into machine code, has higher execution efficiency. Efficient garbage collection mechanism reduces the risk of memory leaks. Fast startup time without loading the runtime interpreter. Request processing performance is similar, and concurrent and asynchronous programming are supported. Lower memory usage, directly compiled into machine code without the need for additional interpreters and virtual machines.
