Golang GIN error when binding form data
php editor Xinyi brings you a solution to the problem of errors when binding form data in the Golang GIN framework. When using the GIN framework for form data binding, you sometimes encounter some problems, such as the inability to parse the form data correctly. These problems may be caused by parameter binding, data type mismatch, etc. This article will introduce how to correctly bind form data and solve common errors to help developers successfully use the GIN framework for development work.
Question content
When I try to bind a form data request to a structure, it errors out with "Fatal Error: Stack Overflow".
This is my code. There's nothing to explain. I'm getting started with the code but can't figure it out.
Structure
type Wish struct { ID int `gorm:"primarykey;autoIncrement" json:"id"` CreatedAt time.Time `json:"created_at"` UpdatedAt time.Time `json:"updated_at"` DeletedAt gorm.DeletedAt `gorm:"index" json:"deleted_at"` UserID int `json:"user_id" form:"user_id"` User *User `gorm:"foreignKey:UserID" json:"user_data,omitempty"` WishTypeID int `json:"wish_type_id" form:"wish_type_id"` WishType *WishType `gorm:"foreignKey:WishTypeID" json:"wish_type_data,omitempty"` ProcessTrack []*ProcessTrack `gorm:"foreignKey:WishID" json:"process_track,omitempty"` VacationDateRange *VacationDateRange `gorm:"foreignKey:WishID" json:"vacation_date_range,omitempty"` Content string `gorm:"type:varchar(255)" json:"content" form:"content"` Status WishStatus `gorm:"type:integer" json:"status" form:"status"` Files []*File `gorm:"polymorphic:Module;polymorphicValue:wish_files" json:"files,omitempty"` }
Controller
var wish migrations.Wish if err := c.Bind(&wish); err != nil { c.JSON(400, gin.H{"error": err.Error(), "message": "Talep Okunamadı!"}) return } c.JSON(200, wish) return
Request
Solution
I modified the controller
type Req struct { Content string `form:"content"` WishTypeID int `form:"wish_type_id"` VacationDateRange *migrations.VacationDateRange `form:"vacation_date_range"` } err, i, g := authorizer.AuthorizeIt(c, a.Subject, a.Action) if err != nil { c.JSON(i, g) return } var wishReq Req var wish migrations.Wish if err := c.Bind(&wishReq); err != nil { c.JSON(400, gin.H{"error": err.Error(), "message": "Wish can't bind."}) return } wish.WishTypeID = wishReq.WishTypeID wish.Content = wishReq.Content wish.VacationDateRange = wishReq.VacationDateRange
But I still don't understand why it can't be the first style. I've also added common usage. It usually works too.
err, i, g := authorizer.AuthorizeIt(c, a.Subject, a.Action) if err != nil { c.JSON(i, g) return } var announce mig.Announce err = c.Bind(&announce) if err != nil { c.JSON(400, gin.H{"error": err.Error(), "message": "Announce can't bind. Error Code: AN-CRT-20"}) return }
The above is the detailed content of Golang GIN error when binding form data. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

I have the following code: publicSecurityFilterChainsecurityFilterChain(HttpSecurityhttp)throwsException{returnhttp.httpBasic().disable().cors().and().csrf().disable().authorizeHttpRequests().requestMatchers("

Yes, C++ Lambda expressions can support recursion by using std::function: Use std::function to capture a reference to a Lambda expression. With a captured reference, a Lambda expression can call itself recursively.

I'm currently writing a Golang+CGO program and will be using posixucontext in CGO. Since all my core logic will be in ucontext's bind function, we should catch all errors in the code. I tested it by accessing a null pointer, which gave me completely different behavior, all depending on the stack location used by the ucontext. Below are more details with simplified examples. If I allocate the ucontext stack on the thread's stack, it triggers SIGSEGV. But if I allocate it on the heap, it triggers SIGSEGV first and then SIGT when morestack_noctxt is called

Reasons for a C++ program to crash when starting include: missing required libraries or dependencies, uninitialized pointers or reference stack overflows, segfaults, operating system configuration issues, program errors, hardware issues

How to solve the C++ runtime error: 'stackoverflow' In a C++ program, when the recursion level is too deep or the memory used by the program exceeds the stack capacity, a runtime error "stackoverflow" will occur. When this error occurs, the program crashes, and it is difficult to identify the specific cause. This article will introduce some ways to solve 'stackoverflow' errors and provide some code examples. The main cause of the runtime error "stackoverflow" is that within the stack

The recursive algorithm solves structured problems through function self-calling. The advantage is that it is simple and easy to understand, but the disadvantage is that it is less efficient and may cause stack overflow. The non-recursive algorithm avoids recursion by explicitly managing the stack data structure. The advantage is that it is more efficient and avoids the stack. Overflow, the disadvantage is that the code may be more complex. The choice of recursive or non-recursive depends on the problem and the specific constraints of the implementation.

The impact of functions on C++ program performance includes function call overhead, local variable and object allocation overhead: Function call overhead: including stack frame allocation, parameter transfer and control transfer, which has a significant impact on small functions. Local variable and object allocation overhead: A large number of local variable or object creation and destruction can cause stack overflow and performance degradation.

The main difference between Java and Haskell functions is: Syntax: Java uses the return keyword to return results, while Haskell uses the assignment symbol (=). Execution model: Java uses sequential execution, while Haskell uses lazy evaluation. Type system: Java has a static type system, while Haskell has a powerful flexible type system that checks types at compile time and run time. Practical performance: Haskell is more efficient than Java when handling large inputs because it uses tail recursion, while Java uses recursion.
