In most cases, Swoole has better overall performance because it outperforms Workerman in terms of concurrency, memory consumption, I/O throughput, and network throughput. Its performance benefits are due to C extensions, efficient I/O event loops, and memory management techniques, making it suitable for high-concurrency, high-throughput web applications, real-time applications, and microservices architectures.
Performance comparison between Workerman and Swoole
Conclusion:
In In most cases, Swoole has better overall performance.
Detailed comparison:
Workerman and Swoole are two popular high-performance PHP frameworks used for building web applications and services. They both use asynchronous programming, which means they can handle multiple requests without blocking.
Concurrency:
Swoole has higher concurrency. It can handle tens of thousands of concurrent connections, while Workerman can typically handle thousands of connections.
Memory consumption:
Workerman uses PHP coroutines, while Swoole uses C extensions. Therefore, the memory consumption of Swoole is usually lower than that of Workerman.
I/O throughput:
Swoole has higher I/O throughput than Workerman. This is because Swoole uses C extensions to optimize I/O operations.
Network Throughput:
Swoole also has higher network throughput than Workerman. This is because it uses an efficient network I/O event loop.
Performance Advantages:
Swoole’s performance advantages are due to the following factors:
Applicable scenarios:
The above is the detailed content of Who has better performance, workerman or swoole?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!