


Similarities and differences between C++ inline functions and virtual functions
Inline functions embed the function body into the call point, which improves performance and code volume, but has lower readability; virtual functions call functions overridden by subclasses through polymorphism, improving flexibility, but have higher runtime overhead. .
The similarities and differences between C inline functions and virtual functions
Inline functions
Inline functions are compiled The compiler embeds the function body into the call site when it is called, rather than the function that performs the function call process.
Advantages:
- Improve performance: avoid calling overhead.
- Reduce code size: The function body will not appear repeatedly in multiple call points.
Disadvantages:
- Increased compilation time: the function body needs to be compiled for each call point.
- Reduced code readability: function bodies are scattered throughout the code base.
Syntax:
inline int sum(int a, int b) { return a + b; }
Virtual function
Virtual function is a function that achieves polymorphism through the inheritance mechanism . When a virtual function on a parent class object is called, the actual function called is determined by the object's dynamic type.
Advantages:
- Realize polymorphism: subclasses can override the virtual functions of the parent class.
- Improve the scalability and flexibility of the code.
Disadvantages:
- Runtime overhead: Virtual function table maintenance and indirect calls need to be maintained.
- Increased code complexity:
virtual
andoverride
keywords are required.
Grammar:
class Base { public: virtual void print() { std::cout << "Base" << std::endl; } }; class Derived : public Base { public: virtual void print() override { std::cout << "Derived" << std::endl; } };
Comparison of similarities and differences:
Features | Inline function | Virtual function |
---|---|---|
Calling mechanism | Function body embedding | Indirect call |
Performance | Higher | Lower |
Code size | Smaller | Bigger |
Readability | Lower | Higher |
Polymorphism | Not supported | Supported |
##Actual case:
You can use inline functions to implement simple mathematical operations, such as summation:inline int sum(int a, int b) { return a + b; } int main() { std::cout << sum(1, 2) << std::endl; // 输出:3 }
class Shape { public: virtual void draw() = 0; }; class Circle : public Shape { public: virtual void draw() override { std::cout << "Drawing a circle" << std::endl; } }; int main() { Shape* shape = new Circle(); shape->draw(); // 输出:Drawing a circle }
The above is the detailed content of Similarities and differences between C++ inline functions and virtual functions. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

The steps to implement the strategy pattern in C++ are as follows: define the strategy interface and declare the methods that need to be executed. Create specific strategy classes, implement the interface respectively and provide different algorithms. Use a context class to hold a reference to a concrete strategy class and perform operations through it.

Causes and solutions for errors when using PECL to install extensions in Docker environment When using Docker environment, we often encounter some headaches...

This article explores the quantitative trading functions of the three major exchanges, Binance, OKX and Gate.io, aiming to help quantitative traders choose the right platform. The article first introduces the concepts, advantages and challenges of quantitative trading, and explains the functions that excellent quantitative trading software should have, such as API support, data sources, backtesting tools and risk control functions. Subsequently, the quantitative trading functions of the three exchanges were compared and analyzed in detail, pointing out their advantages and disadvantages respectively, and finally giving platform selection suggestions for quantitative traders of different levels of experience, and emphasizing the importance of risk assessment and strategic backtesting. Whether you are a novice or an experienced quantitative trader, this article will provide you with valuable reference

AI hardware design tools include: EDA tools such as Cadence Innovus and Synopsys IC Compiler for integrated circuit layout and verification. SoC design platforms such as Xilinx Vivado Design Suite and Intel FPGA SDK for FPGA and SoC development. Deep learning frameworks, such as TensorFlow and PyTorch, are used to build and train deep learning models. Hardware modeling and simulation tools, such as Synopsys VCS and ModelSim, are used to verify and simulate hardware designs. Other tools like Chisel,

Yes, Lambda expressions can significantly improve C++ performance because it allows functions to be passed as variables and eliminates the overhead of function calls through inline unrolling, such as: Inline unrolling optimization: inserting code directly into the calling location, eliminating function call overhead . Lightweight functions: Lambda expressions are typically more lightweight than regular functions, further reducing overhead. Practical example: In the sorting algorithm, Lambda expressions eliminate comparison function calls and improve performance. Other usage scenarios: as callback function, data filtering and code simplification. Caveats: Capture variables carefully, consider memory usage, and avoid overuse to maintain readability.

C was chosen to develop embedded systems because of their efficient performance, close to hardware control capabilities and rich programming characteristics. 1) C provides manual memory management, suitable for environments with limited resources; 2) supports multi-threaded programming to ensure real-time response; 3) allows direct operation of hardware registers to achieve precise control.

"Doubao" is a powerful AI assistant with complex software architecture and technical support behind it. The core of the architecture is a large language model (LLM) and image generation model, and also includes modules such as natural language processing, multi-modal generation, user interface, data storage and cloud computing platform. These modules adopt a microservices architecture and are developed using programming languages such as Python, Java, C, etc. The architecture is still evolving, and more advanced AI technology may be introduced in the future to improve the performance and functionality of “Bean Bao”.

According to news from this website on August 7, the TIOBE Programming Community Index is an indicator that measures the popularity of programming languages. The judgment is based on engineers, courses, suppliers and search engines around the world. The TIOBE official website recently announced the August 2023 programming language rankings. It is reported that Python still ranks first, accounting for 13.33%, C language ranks second, accounting for 11.41%, and C++ ranks third, accounting for 10.63%. Compared with C language, the gap is 0.78%. In addition, Java ranks fourth, accounting for 10.33%, C# ranks fifth, accounting for 7.04%, and JavaScript still maintains sixth place on the list this month, accounting for 3.29%. This site attaches a series of lists such as
