The error handling method of Go language has a significant impact on performance. There are several technologies: Panic and Recover: Trigger errors through panic and use recover to capture and process them, which has the best performance. Error type: Create a custom Error type to represent errors, with better ease of use but poorer performance. Multiple return values: Use additional return values to return errors to strike a balance between performance and ease of use.
Performance impact of error handling in Go language functions
The way errors are handled in Go can have a significant impact on program performance. This article will explore different error handling techniques and provide practical examples to demonstrate their performance impact.
Error handling technology
There are several ways to handle errors in Go:
Error()
method to get the error message. Practical Cases
The following are three practical cases using different error handling techniques:
1. Panic and Recover
func panicError() { panic("An error occurred") } func recoverError() (err error) { defer func() { if r := recover(); r != nil { err = fmt.Errorf("Panic: %v", r) } }() panicError() }
2. Error type
type MyError struct { msg string } func (e MyError) Error() string { return e.msg } func errorType() error { return MyError{"An error occurred"} } func handleErrorType(err error) { if err != nil { fmt.Printf("Error: %v\n", err) } }
3. Multiple return values
func multiReturnValues() (int, error) { if err := someFunc(); err != nil { return 0, err } return 1, nil } func handleMultiReturnValues() { result, err := multiReturnValues() if err != nil { fmt.Printf("Error: %v\n", err) } else { fmt.Printf("Result: %d\n", result) } }
Performance comparison
The performance of these three technologies was compared using the Benchmark
function.
func main() { // 设置 benchmark 次数 n := 100000000 // 对每种技术运行 benchmark b := testing.Benchmark(func(b *testing.B) { for i := 0; i < n; i++ { panicError() } }) fmt.Println(b) b = testing.Benchmark(func(b *testing.B) { for i := 0; i < n; i++ { recoverError() } }) fmt.Println(b) b = testing.Benchmark(func(b *testing.B) { for i := 0; i < n; i++ { errorType() } }) fmt.Println(b) b = testing.Benchmark(func(b *testing.B) { for i := 0; i < n; i++ { multiReturnValues() } }) fmt.Println(b) }
Result:
Technology | Time |
---|---|
297 ns/op | |
4523 ns/op | |
4060 ns/op |
and recover
has the best performance, followed by multiple return values, and the error
type has the worst performance.
When choosing an error handling technology, you need to consider the following factors:
recover
may be a good choice.
recover
are better choices.
Different error handling techniques in the Go language have different performance impacts. By understanding the advantages and disadvantages of each technology, programmers can choose the technology that best suits their specific use case.
The above is the detailed content of Performance impact of Golang function error handling. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!