Soyons réalistes : en tant que développeurs, nous sommes toujours à la recherche de moyens de rationaliser notre flux de travail et de gagner de précieuses minutes sur notre temps de codage.
Qui a envie de passer des heures à lutter contre un code maladroit alors qu'il existe une solution élégante et efficace au coin de la rue ?
Aujourd'hui, je partage 10 astuces JavaScript, certaines intégrées, d'autres personnalisées, qui vous feront vous demander comment vous avez pu vivre sans elles.
Super ! Passons à la première section. Nous commencerons par une fonctionnalité JavaScript simple mais incroyablement utile.
Problème : Vous essayez d'accéder à une propriété située au plus profond d'un objet, mais vous n'êtes pas sûr que toutes les propriétés de la chaîne existent. Cela peut conduire à ces redoutables erreurs « Impossible de lire les propriétés d'undéfini ».
const user = {
// address: { street: "123 Main St" }
};
let street = user.address.street;
console.log(street); // Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'street')
Ancienne solution douloureuse : Vous devrez écrire un tas d'instructions if imbriquées pour vérifier si chaque propriété existe avant d'essayer d'y accéder.
const user = {
// address: { street: "123 Main St" }
};
// The old, painful way:
let street = user && user.address && user.address.street;
console.log(street); // undefined
Nouvelle Solution Moderne :Enchaînement optionnel à la rescousse ! Avec ?., l'expression court-circuite vers undéfini si une propriété est manquante, évitant ainsi les erreurs.
const user = {
// address: { street: "123 Main St" }
};
// The elegant, modern way:
let street = user?.address?.street;
console.log(street); // undefined:
Avec le chaînage facultatif (?.), si une propriété de la chaîne est nulle ou indéfinie, l'expression court-circuite et renvoie simplement undéfini au lieu de lancer une redoutable TypeError. Fini les déclarations maladroites qui encombrent votre code !
Exemple concret :
Imaginez que vous récupérez des données à partir d'une API et que la structure de réponse peut varier. Au lieu d'écrire plusieurs chèques imbriqués, le chaînage facultatif fournit un moyen propre et concis d'accéder aux données qui peuvent ou non être présentes.
Problème : Vous souhaitez attribuer une valeur par défaut à une variable si elle est nulle ou indéfinie, mais vous ne voulez pas accidentellement remplacer des valeurs fausses qui pourraient être valides dans votre code, comme 0 ou un chaîne vide.
Ancienne solution douloureuse : L'utilisation de l'opérateur logique OU (||) pour définir les valeurs par défaut pourrait entraîner ces conséquences involontaires.
const user = { name: 0 };
// The old way (potentially problematic):
let postCount = user.name || "No posts yet!";
console.log(postCount); // Outputs "No posts yet!", even though 0 might be a valid post count.
Nouvelle solution moderne : L'opérateur de coalescence nul (??) sauve la mise ! Il ne fournit la valeur par défaut que si l'opérande de gauche est strictement nul ou indéfini.
const user = { name: 0 };
// The new, improved way:
let postCount = user.name ?? "No posts yet!";
console.log(postCount); // Outputs 0, respecting the actual value of user.name
Notre fidèle ?? n'intervient que si l'opérande de gauche est nul ou indéfini, garantissant que la valeur par défaut n'est utilisée que lorsque cela est prévu.
Exemple concret :
Imaginez un profil utilisateur où 0 est une entrée valide pour le « nombre de publications ». Utiliser || définir une valeur par défaut remplacerait incorrectement 0 par la valeur par défaut. Le ?? L'opérateur évite cet écueil, en respectant le vrai sens de 0 dans ce contexte.
Problème : Vous avez un objet et vous voulez vous assurer qu'aucune de ses propriétés ne peut être accidentellement modifiée après sa création. Ceci est particulièrement important pour les objets de configuration ou les données qui doivent rester constantes.
const colors = {
primary: "blue",
secondary: "green"
};
colors.primary = "red"; // Accidental modification is too easy!
console.log(colors.primary); // Outputs "red" - the object was modified
Solution : Object.freeze() rend votre objet solide comme le roc ! Il empêche toute modification ultérieure de ses propriétés.
const colors = {
primary: "blue",
secondary: "green"
};
Object.freeze(colors);
colors.primary = "red"; // This will silently fail
console.log(colors.primary); // Still outputs "blue"
Object.freeze() prend un objet et le rend immuable. Toute tentative de modification de ses propriétés sera silencieusement ignorée. C'est comme mettre votre objet dans une vitrine : vous pouvez regarder, mais vous ne pouvez pas toucher !
Exemple concret :
Imaginez que vous ayez des paramètres de configuration stockés dans un objet. L'utilisation d'Object.freeze() garantit que ces paramètres restent constants dans toute votre application, empêchant ainsi les modifications accidentelles pouvant entraîner un comportement inattendu.
Problème : Vous devez extraire des valeurs spécifiques d'un tableau et les affecter à des variables individuelles. L'accès traditionnel aux tableaux à l'aide d'index peut sembler un peu compliqué, en particulier pour les tableaux plus longs.
Ancienne solution douloureuse : Vous finirez par accéder aux éléments par leur index, qui peut être moins lisible et plus sujet aux erreurs, d'autant plus que les tableaux grandissent.
const rgb = [255, 128, 0]; const red = rgb[0]; const green = rgb[1]; const blue = rgb[2]; console.log(red, green, blue); // 255 128 0
Nouvelle solution moderne : La déstructuration de tableaux fournit un moyen élégant et lisible de « décompresser » les éléments d'un tableau en variables distinctes.
const rgb = [255, 128, 0]; const [red, green, blue] = rgb; console.log(red, green, blue); // 255 128 0
En utilisant des crochets [] sur le côté gauche d'une affectation, nous créons un motif qui reflète la structure du tableau. JavaScript attribue ensuite soigneusement les valeurs correspondantes du tableau aux variables.
Exemple concret :
Imagine you have an array representing a user’s information: [name, age, city]. With destructuring, you can easily extract these values into separate variables for more readable and maintainable code.
Problem: You’re writing a function, and you want to provide default values for parameters in case the caller doesn’t supply them.
Old Painful Solution: You’d have to check if the arguments were undefined within the function body and assign default values manually.
function greet(name, message) {
const userName = name || "Stranger";
const greeting = message || "Hello there!";
console.log(`${greeting}, ${userName}!`);
}
greet(); // Hello there!, Stranger!
greet("Alice"); // Hello there!, Alice!
greet("Bob", "Good morning"); // Good morning, Bob!
New Modern Solution: Default parameters let you specify default values for function parameters directly within the function definition.
By assigning values to parameters in the function signature (name = "Stranger"), we tell JavaScript to use those values if the corresponding arguments are not provided when the function is called.
Real-World Example:
Consider a function that calculates the area of a rectangle. You could set default values for width and height to 1, so if the function is called without arguments, it returns the area of a unit square.
Problem: You want to create more powerful and flexible string formatting capabilities beyond what’s offered by basic template literals. You might need custom parsing, escaping, or data transformations within your string construction.
Old Painful Solution: You’d rely on a combination of string concatenation, helper functions, and potentially complex logic to achieve the desired results.
function highlight(text, name) {
// Find the index of the placeholder within the text
const placeholderIndex = text.indexOf("%name%");
if (placeholderIndex !== -1) {
// Replace the placeholder with the actual name
return text.substring(0, placeholderIndex) + name + text.substring(placeholderIndex + 6);
} else {
return text;
}
}
const name = "Alice";
const message = highlight("Welcome, %name%!", name);
console.log(message); // "Welcome, Alice!"
New Modern Solution: Tagged template literals allow you to define custom functions (called “tag functions”) that can process template literal strings before they’re interpolated.
function highlight(strings, ...values) {
let result = '';
for (let i = 0; i < strings.length; i++) {
result += strings[I];
if (values[i]) {
result += `<span class="highlight">${values[i]}</span>`;
}
}
return result;
}
const name = "Alice";
const message = highlight`Welcome, ${name}!`;
console.log(message); // "Welcome, <span class="highlight">Alice</span>!"
Old Solution: We relied on a separate function (highlight) that took the text and the value to be inserted as separate arguments. We manually searched for a placeholder (%name%) and replaced it. This approach is less flexible, more error-prone (what if the placeholder is wrong?), and doesn't scale well for more complex formatting.
New Solution: With tagged template literals, the highlight function receives the string parts and the interpolated values as separate arguments. This allows for much cleaner manipulation and transformation of the string based on its structure and the provided values.
Real-World Example:
Creating Domain-Specific Languages (DSLs): Build custom templating engines, query builders, or even mini-languages within your JavaScript code.
Internationalization (i18n): Handle translations and localized string formatting based on user preferences.
Security: Implement robust sanitization and escaping mechanisms for user-generated content within strings.
Problem: You need fine-grained control over object operations, such as property access, assignment, function calls, or even object construction. You might want to implement custom validation, logging, or even modify the behavior of existing objects without directly changing their code.
Old Painful Solution: You’d often resort to:
Wrapper Functions: Creating functions that encapsulate object interactions, adding overhead and potentially obscuring the underlying object’s interface.
Overriding Methods: Modifying object prototypes, which can lead to unexpected side effects and conflicts, especially in larger codebases.
const user = {
name: "Alice",
age: 30,
};
function validateAge(age) {
if (age < 0 || age > 120) {
throw new Error("Invalid age value!");
}
return age;
}
// Using a wrapper function to enforce validation
function setUserAge(user, newAge) {
user.age = validateAge(newAge);
}
setUserAge(user, 35); // Works
setUserAge(user, -5); // Throws an error
New Modern Solution: Proxy objects act as intermediaries, intercepting fundamental operations on an object and giving you the power to customize how those operations are handled.
const user = {
name: "Alice",
age: 30,
};
const userProxy = new Proxy(user, {
set: function (target, property, value) {
if (property === "age") {
if (value < 0 || value > 120) {
throw new Error("Invalid age value!");
}
}
// Update the original object's property
target[property] = value;
return true; // Indicate success
},
});
userProxy.age = 35; // Works
userProxy.age = -5; // Throws an error
We create a Proxy object, passing in the target object (user) and a handler object.
The handler object defines “traps” for various operations. In this case, we use the set trap to intercept property assignments.
Inside the set trap, we perform custom validation for the age property.
If the validation passes, we update the original object’s property using target[property] = value.
Real-World Example:
Data Validation and Sanitization: Enforce data integrity rules before saving objects to a database or sending them over a network.
Change Tracking: Log or react to changes made to an object’s properties.
Lazy Loading: Defer loading expensive object properties until they are actually accessed.
Problem: You need to perform sophisticated transformations or calculations on arrays, going beyond simple aggregation like finding the sum or maximum value.
Old Painful Solution: You might resort to:
Imperative Loops: Writing verbose for or while loops, often with nested logic and temporary variables, making the code harder to read and maintain.
Specialized Functions: Creating separate functions for each specific array transformation, leading to code duplication.
const orders = [
{ product: "Shirt", quantity: 2, price: 15 },
{ product: "Shoes", quantity: 1, price: 50 },
{ product: "Hat", quantity: 3, price: 10 },
];
// Calculate the total value of all orders (imperative approach)
let totalValue = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < orders.length; i++) {
totalValue += orders[i].quantity * orders[i].price;
}
console.log(totalValue); // Output: 110
New Modern Solution: The reduce() method provides a versatile way to iterate over an array and "reduce" it to a single value, applying a callback function to each element and accumulating a result.
const orders = [
{ product: "Shirt", quantity: 2, price: 15 },
{ product: "Shoes", quantity: 1, price: 50 },
{ product: "Hat", quantity: 3, price: 10 },
];
// Calculate the total value of all orders using reduce
const totalValue = orders.reduce((accumulator, order) => {
return accumulator + order.quantity * order.price;
}, 0); // Initial value of the accumulator
console.log(totalValue); // Output: 110
reduce() takes two arguments: a callback function and an optional initial value for the accumulator.
The callback function receives the accumulator (which starts with the initial value or the first element) and the current element.
In each iteration, the callback returns the updated accumulator, which is then passed to the next iteration.
The final value returned by reduce() is the accumulated result.
Real-World Example:
const products = [
{ name: "Apple", category: "Fruit" },
{ name: "Banana", category: "Fruit" },
{ name: "Carrot", category: "Vegetable" },
];
const groupedProducts = products.reduce((groups, product) => {
const category = product.category;
if (!groups[category]) {
groups[category] = [];
}
groups[category].push(product);
return groups;
}, {});
console.log(groupedProducts);
// Output: { Fruit: [{...}, {...}], Vegetable: [{...}] }
const nestedArray = [1, [2, 3], [4, [5, 6]]];
const flatArray = nestedArray.reduce(
(acc, current) => acc.concat(Array.isArray(current) ? current.flat() : current),[]);
console.log(flatArray); // Output: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
const numbers = [1, 2, 2, 3, 4, 4, 5];
const uniqueNumbers = numbers.reduce((unique, number) => {
return unique.includes(number) ? unique : [...unique, number];
}, []);
console.log(uniqueNumbers); // Output: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Mastering reduce() unlocks a higher level of array manipulation, allowing you to express complex transformations concisely and elegantly.
Problem: You need to copy arrays, combine them, or insert elements at specific positions. Similarly, you might want to create copies of objects with modified properties. Doing this manually can be tedious and involve loops or multiple lines of code.
Old Painful Solution: You’d use combinations of slice(), concat(), or Object.assign() for these tasks:
Arrays:
const numbers1 = [1, 2, 3]; const numbers2 = [4, 5, 6]; // Concatenating arrays const combinedArray = numbers1.concat(numbers2); // Inserting the number 0 at index 2 (the old way) const newArray = numbers1.slice(0, 2).concat([0], numbers1.slice(2));
Objects:
const product = {
name: "Phone",
price: 499,
};
// Creating a modified copy
const updatedProduct = Object.assign({}, product, { price: 599 });
New Modern Solution: The spread syntax (...) provides a more concise and flexible way to work with arrays and objects:
Arrays:
const numbers1 = [1, 2, 3]; const numbers2 = [4, 5, 6]; // Concatenating arrays const combinedArray = [...numbers1, ...numbers2]; // Inserting an element const newArray = [...numbers1.slice(0, 2), 0, ...numbers1.slice(2)];
Objects:
const product = {
name: "Phone",
price: 499,
};
// Creating a modified copy
const updatedProduct = { ...product, price: 599 };
Spread Syntax with Arrays: When used with arrays, ... expands the elements of an array in place.
Spread Syntax with Objects: When used with objects, ... expands the key-value pairs of an object.
Why It’s Easier:
Conciseness: Spread syntax significantly reduces the code required for common array and object operations.
Readability: The code becomes more declarative and easier to understand.
Real-World Example:
// Example in a React component
this.setState(prevState => ({
...prevState,
cartItems: [...prevState.cartItems, newItem],
}));
Spread syntax is a versatile tool that simplifies array and object manipulation, making your code more concise, readable, and maintainable.
Problem: You often need to write short, anonymous functions for event handlers, callbacks, or array methods, but the traditional function syntax can feel a bit verbose in these cases.
Old Painful Solution: You’d use the function keyword to define anonymous functions:
// Example with an array method
const numbers = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
const doubledNumbers = numbers.map(function(number) {
return number * 2;
});
console.log(doubledNumbers); // Output: [2, 4, 6, 8, 10]
New Modern Solution: Arrow functions (=>) provide a more compact syntax for writing functions, especially for short function bodies:
const numbers = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]; const doubledNumbers = numbers.map((number) => number * 2); console.log(doubledNumbers); // Output: [2, 4, 6, 8, 10]
Syntax: An arrow function is defined with parentheses for parameters (or a single parameter without parentheses), followed by the arrow (=>), and then the function body.
Implicit Return: If the function body contains a single expression, the result of that expression is implicitly returned without needing the return keyword.
Lexical this Binding: Arrow functions don't have their own this binding. They inherit this from the surrounding scope, which can be very useful in certain situations (we'll explore this in a later example).
Why It’s Easier:
Shorter Syntax: Arrow functions significantly reduce the code required to define simple functions.
Improved Readability: The code becomes more concise and easier to follow, especially when used with array methods.
Real-World Example:
const button = document.getElementById("myButton");
button.addEventListener("click", () => {
console.log("Button clicked!");
});
This is just the beginning! The world of JavaScript is vast. ?
Keep experimenting, keep learning, and never be afraid to break things (in a safe coding environment, of course! ?).
Want to stay connected? Follow me on Instagram @codingwithjd for more coding tips, tricks, and even some bad programming jokes. ?
Ce qui précède est le contenu détaillé de. pour plus d'informations, suivez d'autres articles connexes sur le site Web de PHP en chinois!
![[Web front-end] Démarrage rapide de Node.js](https://img.php.cn/upload/course/000/000/067/662b5d34ba7c0227.png)
