To compare two representative frameworks, bs does not require any technology stack, on the contrary, ant requires es6 react node, etc.
But the compatibility processing of bs is better than that of ant, or the compatibility work I need to do when using bs will be less than that of ant. The purpose of the framework is not to make my subsequent applications and processing more convenient, so there is no need to use bs at all. That’s the right question!
So the ant frameworks were born for the sake of technology?
The above is purely personal understanding, mainly a doubt about old and new technologies
![[Web front-end] Node.js quick start](https://img.php.cn/upload/course/000/000/067/662b5d34ba7c0227.png)
They are two completely different types of things and are not comparable. One is a UI style library and the other is a component library based on react. They can all work with react. However, I would like to ask a few questions. Once these questions are clarified, you will be clear. You still need to figure out the issues of understanding by yourself. No matter how much others say, it will be useless. Why do you need react? What pains in development does react solve? What are components? What are the benefits of component-based programming?