The answer above has been very professional... I will answer it in a vernacular way, haha For example, when I see a method, it might look like this
public BigCar find(Long carId)
The premise that there is no problem in compiling this method is that BigCar is an existing class. I want to query the big car BigCar
based on the ID of a car.
At this time, you still want to write a query method for the small car SmallCar. You should probably create a SmallCar first, and then write a query method
public SmallCar find(Long carId)
No problem, at this time, if you want to write a way of querying based on ID whether it is a big car or a small car, the way to write it is
public XXX find(Long carId)
Then the compiler will definitely be worried. What the hell is your XXX? There is no such class Knock on the blackboard! ! ! Here comes the point There is a grammar at this time. If you want to indicate that this XXX is just a referent, but you don’t know what it is specifically, then use <> to express it. You can write n referents in it Things separated by commas, this is written as
public <XXX> XXX find(Long carId)
So, <> just represents a definer, which defines a bunch of variables for subsequent use. If you define it in a method, then the scope of application of this variable is in this method. If you define it in a class Defined in, hey, then this variable can be used in the entire class, for example:
public class Car<X, XX>{
X x;
XX xx;
Long id;
public X findX(){
return x;
}
}
The way to write Java's generic method, the syntax stipulates The return type is T <T> indicates that this is a generic method (I guess it is related to compilation, after all, Java generics are erased
The answer above has been very professional... I will answer it in a vernacular way, haha
For example, when I see a method, it might look like this
The premise that there is no problem in compiling this method is that
based on the ID of a car.BigCar
is an existing class. I want to query the big carBigCar
At this time, you still want to write a query method for the small car
SmallCar
. You should probably create aSmallCar
first, and then write a query methodNo problem, at this time, if you want to write a way of querying based on ID whether it is a big car or a small car, the way to write it is
Then the compiler will definitely be worried. What the hell is your XXX? There is no such class
Knock on the blackboard! ! ! Here comes the point
There is a grammar at this time. If you want to indicate that this
XXX
is just a referent, but you don’t know what it is specifically, then use<>
to express it. You can write n referents in it Things separated by commas, this is written asSo,
<>
just represents a definer, which defines a bunch of variables for subsequent use. If you define it in a method, then the scope of application of this variable is in this method. If you define it in a class Defined in, hey, then this variable can be used in the entire class, for example:The way to write Java's generic method, the syntax stipulates
The return type is T
<T> indicates that this is a generic method (I guess it is related to compilation, after all, Java generics are erased