In fact, in terms of usage, the difference is not very big. The main difference is in the package manager. Ubuntu does have more packages. As for the desktop, I personally feel that Ubuntu's unity desktop is not easy to use, and Fedora's default seems to be gnome (it used to be, but I don't know now) and it is also difficult to use. In comparison, Unity is better (the interface is still beautiful, the launcher is easy to use, and there is a dash).
If you don’t make too many assumptions about the details of your usage scenario, I think both systems are acceptable. You can also try some separately.
Debian distributions are easy to use, especially Ubuntu, but my personal experience is to use the 14.04 If it hangs, the hard disk action indicator light stays on, and the problem can only be solved by restarting, or it may be an exception.
Second words: Too much work on the work machine affects work efficiency, and it is still task-driven work. Naturally, I can’t stand it, so I defected to the embrace of Windows.
No matter which one you use for development, after all, the development environment is now virtualized. I switched from Ubuntu to Fedora for the desktop. The system that leader Linus is using has much better user experience and stability than Ubuntu.
It is recommended to choose Ubuntu for entry, as there are more active people in the community.
Use
Ubuntu
, I prefer Ubuntu, and it’s easier to switch workspaces. The installation of development tools is also relatively simple and convenient.If you are not very familiar with Linux, I think deepin is also good
In fact, in terms of usage, the difference is not very big. The main difference is in the package manager. Ubuntu does have more packages. As for the desktop, I personally feel that Ubuntu's unity desktop is not easy to use, and Fedora's default seems to be gnome (it used to be, but I don't know now) and it is also difficult to use. In comparison, Unity is better (the interface is still beautiful, the launcher is easy to use, and there is a dash).
If you don’t make too many assumptions about the details of your usage scenario, I think both systems are acceptable. You can also try some separately.
I am currently using Ubuntu+i3wm.
Debian distributions are easy to use, especially Ubuntu, but my personal experience is to use the 14.04 If it hangs, the hard disk action indicator light stays on, and the problem can only be solved by restarting, or it may be an exception.
Second words: Too much work on the work machine affects work efficiency, and it is still task-driven work. Naturally, I can’t stand it, so I defected to the embrace of Windows.
Suggestion
Ubuntu
工具链多。个人认为Linux图形化中做的最好的,不要用优麒麟
, if it’s rubbish, the original one is betterUbuntu is fine for development, just use whichever you like
No matter which one you use for development, after all, the development environment is now virtualized. I switched from Ubuntu to Fedora for the desktop. The system that leader Linus is using has much better user experience and stability than Ubuntu.
linuxmint or ubuntu-gnome are better
Ubuntu is good for development and debugging. Centos does not work as a server.