I think which one is more convenient for your work? Everyone in my last company used Ubuntu because they had to do some special compilation work, and Ubuntu was the smoothest to use. Now everyone in this company group uses Mac...because...the Mac issued by the company (run
Debian boasts good processors, the others are only x86 and have various processor versions. It can be used with any mips arm. The advantage is that when you change the processor, Debian can still be used, which reduces the pitfall cost
I have used centos, fedora, ubuntu, and mac. If you have a mac, you can use a mac. The most convenient way to develop is to use ubuntu. There are many tools and it is convenient to develop and install software packages.
I think ubantu seems to be very laggy to use. I have installed it on a virtual machine and a laptop before, and I think it is more laggy than WINDOWS. I have never used Fedora. Is there anyone who has used it? Let me compare, which one is smoother?
Personally, I feel that as an aspiring developer, I should use crappy distribution, so that I can encounter more problems and solve them one by one, which can improve my Linux technology very quickly
Centos, it is recommended not to use a graphical interface. Direct command line operation. When installing a virtual machine under windows, if you need file sharing or something, install samba.
Linux Deepin and Ubuntu Kylin are both available, with built-in Sogou input method and WPS, ready to use out of the box, suitable for Chinese users.
VPS server can use Ubuntu Server or Debian.
All the distributions mentioned above are Debian-based. Debian-based software sources include far more software packages than Redhat-based software, such as the official Raspbian for Raspberry Pi, Valve’s game console system SteamOS, and Goobuntu used internally by Google. It is developed based on Debian.
Will it not work if I change the platform...?
I think which one is more convenient for your work? Everyone in my last company used Ubuntu because they had to do some special compilation work, and Ubuntu was the smoothest to use. Now everyone in this company group uses Mac...because...the Mac issued by the company (run
Debian boasts good processors, the others are only x86 and have various processor versions. It can be used with any mips arm. The advantage is that when you change the processor, Debian can still be used, which reduces the pitfall cost
I have used centos, fedora, ubuntu, and mac. If you have a mac, you can use a mac.
The most convenient way to develop is to use ubuntu. There are many tools and it is convenient to develop and install software packages.
I think ubantu seems to be very laggy to use. I have installed it on a virtual machine and a laptop before, and I think it is more laggy than WINDOWS. I have never used Fedora. Is there anyone who has used it? Let me compare, which one is smoother?
Personally, I feel that as an aspiring developer, I should use crappy distribution, so that I can encounter more problems and solve them one by one, which can improve my Linux technology very quickly
Centos, it is recommended not to use a graphical interface. Direct command line operation. When installing a virtual machine under windows, if you need file sharing or something, install samba.
Linux Deepin and Ubuntu Kylin are both available, with built-in Sogou input method and WPS, ready to use out of the box, suitable for Chinese users.
VPS server can use Ubuntu Server or Debian.
All the distributions mentioned above are Debian-based. Debian-based software sources include far more software packages than Redhat-based software, such as the official Raspbian for Raspberry Pi, Valve’s game console system SteamOS, and Goobuntu used internally by Google. It is developed based on Debian.