I am currently using coding, but I haven’t officially used git@oschina yet. After reading articles online, the difference in theme is:
coding uses Java development for myself, git@oschina uses gitlab
Considering from another aspect, Zhang Hailong, the founder of coding.net, also participated in the creation of the early oschina open source China. But it should have nothing to do with the later git@oschina, but there was a similar project called "China Source" before. Listen to Zhang Hailong himself He said he has a deep relationship with him. For media reports about China sources, please refer to the report on Global Network.
I am using both I feel that oschina is very complete. Team collaboration and Git are separate, but they can be integrated through binding. oschina is large and comprehensive. Coding is also very comprehensive from team management, code hosting, testing, and now also online code market, etc. It feels more suitable for small teams and individuals when used, and the interface and experience are quite fresh.
The experience of code hosting is almost the same, and sometimes push fails.
![[Web front-end] Node.js quick start](https://img.php.cn/upload/course/000/000/067/662b5d34ba7c0227.png)
Github does not need to be bypassed, you can access it directly
Personally, I still recommend using coding. In addition to hosting, it can also be used for team collaboration.
The oschina is also very good.
You can experience it separately. The most important thing is that it is suitable for yourself or a team.
I am currently using coding, but I haven’t officially used git@oschina yet. After reading articles online, the difference in theme is:
Considering from another aspect, Zhang Hailong, the founder of coding.net, also participated in the creation of the early oschina open source China. But it should have nothing to do with the later git@oschina, but there was a similar project called "China Source" before. Listen to Zhang Hailong himself He said he has a deep relationship with him. For media reports about China sources, please refer to the report on Global Network.
I am using both
I feel that oschina is very complete. Team collaboration and Git are separate, but they can be integrated through binding. oschina is large and comprehensive.
Coding is also very comprehensive from team management, code hosting, testing, and now also online code market, etc. It feels more suitable for small teams and individuals when used, and the interface and experience are quite fresh.
The experience of code hosting is almost the same, and sometimes push fails.