git check-attr - [ Git中文开发手册 ] - 在线原生手册

简体中文(ZH-CN) English(EN) 繁体中文(ZH-TW) 日本語(JA) 한국어(KO) Melayu(MS) Français(FR) Deutsch(DE)

目錄搜尋

Guides gitattributes giteveryday gitglossary gitignore gitmodules gitrevisions gittutorial gitworkflows Administration git archive git bundle git clean git filter-branch git fsck git gc git instaweb git reflog Basic Snapshotting git add git commit git diff git mv git reset git rm git status Branching and Merging git branch git checkout git log git merge git mergetool git stash git tag Debugging git bisect git blame git grep Email git am git format-patch git request-pull git send-email External Systems git fast-import git svn Getting and Creating Projects git clone git init Git git annotate git archimport git bisect-lk2009 git check-attr git check-mailmap git check-ref-format git checkout-index git cherry git citool git column git credential git credential-cache git credential-store git cvsexportcommit git cvsimport git cvsserver git diff-files git diff-tree git difftool git fast-export git fetch-pack git fmt-merge-msg git get-tar-commit-id git gui git http-backend git http-fetch git http-push git imap-send git index-pack git interpret-trailers git ls-remote git ls-tree git mailinfo git mailsplit git merge-file git merge-index git merge-one-file git merge-tree git mktag git mktree git name-rev git notes git p4 git pack-objects git pack-redundant git pack-refs git parse-remote git patch-id git prune git prune-packed git quiltimport git receive-pack git remote-ext git remote-fd git remote-testgit git repack git replace git rerere git send-pack git sh-i18n git sh-setup git shell git show-branch git show-index git stripspace git unpack-file git unpack-objects git upload-archive git upload-pack git var git verify-commit git verify-tag git whatchanged git worktree Inspection and Comparison git describe git shortlog git show Miscellaneous api credentials api index gitcli gitcore tutorial gitcredentials gitcvs migration gitdiffcore githooks gitk gitnamespaces gitremote helpers gitrepository layout gitsubmodules gittutorial 2 gitweb gitweb.conf pack format User Manual Patching git apply git cherry-pick git rebase git revert Plumbing Commands git cat-file git check-ignore git commit-tree git count-objects git diff-index git for-each-ref git hash-object git ls-files git merge-base git read-tree git rev-list git rev-parse git show-ref git symbolic-ref git update-index git update-ref git verify-pack git write-tree Server Admin git daemon git update-server-info Setup and Config git git config git help Sharing and Updating Projects git fetch git pull git push git remote git submodule

文字

命名

git-check-attr - 显示 gitattributes 信息

概要

git check-attr [-a | --all | attr…] [--] pathname…
git check-attr --stdin [-z] [-a | --all | attr…]

There is already a project called BBChop created by Ealdwulf Wuffinga on Github that does something like that using Bayesian Search Theory [9]:

BBChop is like git bisect (or equivalent), but works when your bug is intermittent. That is, it works in the presence of false negatives (when a version happens to work this time even though it contains the bug). It assumes that there are no false positives (in principle, the same approach would work, but adding it may be non-trivial).

But BBChop is independent of any VCS and it would be easier for Git users to have something integrated in Git.

Conclusion

We have seen that regressions are an important problem, and that "git bisect" has nice features that complement very well practices and other tools, especially test suites, that are generally used to fight regressions. But it might be needed to change some work-flows and (bad) habits to get the most out of it.

Some improvements to the algorithms inside "git bisect" are possible and some new features could help in some cases, but overall "git bisect" works already very well, is used a lot, and is already very useful. To back up that last claim, let’s give the final word to Ingo Molnar when he was asked by the author how much time does he think "git bisect" saves him when he uses it:

a lot. About ten years ago did i do my first bisection of a Linux patch queue. That was prior the Git (and even prior the BitKeeper) days. I literally days spent sorting out patches, creating what in essence were standalone commits that i guessed to be related to that bug. It was a tool of absolute last resort. I’d rather spend days looking at printk output than do a manual patch bisection. With Git bisect it’s a breeze: in the best case i can get a ~15 step kernel bisection done in 20-30 minutes, in an automated way. Even with manual help or when bisecting multiple, overlapping bugs, it’s rarely more than an hour. In fact it’s invaluable because there are bugs i would never even try to debug if it wasn’t for git bisect. In the past there were bug patterns that were immediately hopeless for me to debug - at best i could send the crash/bug signature to lkml and hope that someone else can think of something. And even if a bisection fails today it tells us something valuable about the bug: that it’s non-deterministic - timing or kernel image layout dependent. So git bisect is unconditional goodness - and feel free to quote that ;-)

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to Junio Hamano for his help in reviewing this paper, for reviewing the patches I sent to the Git mailing list, for discussing some ideas and helping me improve them, for improving "git bisect" a lot and for his awesome work in maintaining and developing Git.

Many thanks to Ingo Molnar for giving me very useful information that appears in this paper, for commenting on this paper, for his suggestions to improve "git bisect" and for evangelizing "git bisect" on the linux kernel mailing lists.

Many thanks to Linus Torvalds for inventing, developing and evangelizing "git bisect", Git and Linux.

Many thanks to the many other great people who helped one way or another when I worked on Git, especially to Andreas Ericsson, Johannes Schindelin, H. Peter Anvin, Daniel Barkalow, Bill Lear, John Hawley, Shawn O. Pierce, Jeff King, Sam Vilain, Jon Seymour.

Many thanks to the Linux-Kongress program committee for choosing the author to given a talk and for publishing this paper.

当该属性被定义为 true 时。

<value>

当一个值已经被赋值给该属性时。

缓冲发生GIT_FLUSH在 git [1] 中的选项下。调用者负责避免溢出输入缓冲区或从空输出缓冲区读取引起的死锁。

示例

在示例中，使用以下.gitattributes文件：

*.java diff=java -crlf myAttr
NoMyAttr.java !myAttr
README caveat=unspecified

列出一个属性：$ git check-attr diff org/example/MyClass.java org/example/MyClass.java: diff: java

列出文件的多个属性：

$ git check-attr crlf diff myAttr -- org/example/MyClass.java
org/example/MyClass.java: crlf: unset
org/example/MyClass.java: diff: java
org/example/MyClass.java: myAttr: set

列出文件的所有属性：$ git check-attr --all -- org/example/MyClass.java org/example/MyClass.java: diff: java org/example/MyClass.java: myAttr: set

列出多个文件的属性：

$ git check-attr myAttr -- org/example/MyClass.java org/example/NoMyAttr.java
org/example/MyClass.java: myAttr: setorg/example/NoMyAttr.java: myAttr: unspecified

并非所有的价值观都同样明确：

$ git check-attr caveat README
README: caveat: unspecified